Five Things About February 1985′s Doctor Who #5

Via the TARDIS Index File:

On the planet Nefrin, long before Earth was even formed, a woman named Brimo was sentenced to imprisonment in the Eternity Capsule for using her psychic powers to conspire to “pervert the course of destiny.” Brimo stayed confined within the capsule for aeons until Nefrin’s sun eventually collapsed and became a black hole.

This created a split in the fabric of time that produced a blank dimension into which Brimo was sucked. Once inside the blank dimension, Brimo found that she only had to think of something and it would come into existence. Unfortunately, in order to create things in the blank dimension, energy had to be drawn from the normal universe, which could lead to the destruction of the universe if not stopped.

And so:

{Fig. 1}

{Fig. 2}

{Fig. 3}

{Fig. 4}

{Fig. 5}

What the Future Looked Like

THE STORY GOES that Ralph McQuarrie’s art was the reason Star Wars got made: After his script was rejected by however many studios, George Lucas brought concept art he’d commissioned from McQuarrie when he pitched Alan Ladd Jr. at 20th Century Fox. Thirty-plus years later, here’s Star Wars—still going in its billion different incarnations, with all of them relying, in one way or another, on McQuarrie’s visions.

When news broke last night that McQuarrie had died at age 82, it was an unexpected gut punch—not only because of the hours I’ve spent poring over his paintings and sketches, but also because of how McQuarrie’s work opened other doors for me, like the ones with work from Syd Mead and Ron Cobb on the other side. Lucas’ remembrance of McQuarrie (“Beyond the movies, his artwork has inspired at least two generations of younger artists—all of whom learned through Ralph that movies are designed”) is dead-on, and I can’t begin to count how many films, comics, TV shows, videogames, and books owe a debt to McQuarrie. But that’s big-picture stuff. Personally, all I can say is that McQuarrie’s work changed the ways I think about story, and imagination, and—in a sort of vague, nebulous, far-distant sort of way—the future.

Two Pages, Eighteen Panels, One Sound Effect.

IT’S ENTIRELY TOO EASY (and it’s especially easy this month, with stuff like this and this) to grow cynical and sick of the comics industry. But usually when that happens I’ll revisit and/or stumble across something like the image above—a double-page spread from Stumptown by Greg Rucka and Matthew Southworth—and then I’ll be like, “Oh. Yeah. Right. That. That’s why I like comics.”

The Fuel of This Enterprise.

FROM “PLANETARY CONSCIOUSNESS” by Alan Moore, better known as the introduction to Planetary: All Over the World and Other Stories by Warren Ellis and John Cassaday:

The fuel of this enterprise is that sole asset that comics have always relied upon: the unique jolt of an imagination unbounded by cultural notions of fine art or taste, the breathless pulp rush of ideas in defiance of deadlines, or burnout, of fatigue.

It’s Not Called National Good Novel Writing Month.

AFTER A FEW YEARS of quietly snickering at everybody who participated in National Novel Writing Month, I finally decided to just do the thing already, because this idea I’d had for a few months wasn’t getting written any other way, and maybe NaNoWriMo—yep, still hate that acronym—might be the kick in the ass I needed to actually write it. And it was. National Novel Writing Month was pretty fantastic, in that way that things that can be horrible and soul-draining can occasionally be pretty fantastic.

As evidenced by the thrilling graph above, I cranked out 50,000 words in 30 days; that’s hardly an amazing or unique accomplishment, but it’s more than I would’ve managed otherwise, so I’ll take it. They aren’t 50,000 good words—in fact, I’d wager that when I return to the book in about a week and a half to start editing/rewriting it, which I’ll be doing for the next year or so, I’ll discover that the vast majority of those words are sphincter-clenchingly bad. But they’re  50,000 words I can edit and rewrite. So. (And, as it became clear somewhere around the 30,000 mark, they’re 50,000 words I can, and will, add to: There are huge chunks of narrative that’re ridiculously condensed or missing entirely; I’m guessing once all is said and done, this thing will weigh in around 75,000.)

But aside from giving me a challenge to crank out those words, what I found most useful about the whole exercise was the daily cataloguing and display of one’s word count. At the start, I was quite pleased with the aesthetics of my stupid little chart, but then two things happened that cut big chunks out of my writing time—a trip to Boise and Comics Underground—and I could immediately tell when my word counts took a hit. Then, after a particularly miserable Thanksgiving, I spent November 25 doing little but writing, and that shit spiked back up. Seeing this sort of bar graph—with its dents and growth spurts—was remarkably helpful in terms of figuring out my writing habits with regard to what I was aiming for/failing at.

Years ago, when I was first freelancing for the Mercury, I wrote a feature on local indie cartoonists; one of them had a wall next to his drawing table filled with graphs like these to chart his daily goals and progress, all of them meticulously hand-drawn with pencil on the sort of graph paper I didn’t know they even made for anyone who wasn’t a middle-school math teacher. Back then, that dude’s system seemed obsessive, particular, and sterile, but now I understand how it can help. That’s not to say I’ll be getting all chart-obsessed, but it was useful to see how helpful a concrete, daily regimen of writing can be, especially when compared to my usual tactic of writing whenever I can on whatever days I feel like it.

So yeah, an okay month. And now there are about 11 more ahead to ensure it wasn’t for naught.

NaNoWriMo Is Slowly Killing Me.

OBLIGATORY DISCLAIMER: I originally wrote this for Blogtown.

THIS IS MY FIRST YEAR doing National Novel Writing Month, and IT IS SLOWLY KILLING ME. What’s keeping me going, though, are pieces about it from writers I like. Like this blog post from Patrick Rothfuss, who responds to a fan noting that “I could see how your style wouldn’t really lend itself to being able to write a whole 50,000 words in a single month.”

I’ve come to realize that I have a strong seam of contrarian in the bedrock of my personality. If someone says I can’t do something, a piece of my hind brain rears up and says, “the fuck I can’t!”

In the past this has led me into trouble. I’ve done all manner of stupid shit because someone’s dared presume I wouldn’t. Examples include making a naked snow angel, living for a week using nothing but my wits and three dollars, and eating an entire package of ranch seasoning. (Not ranch dressing, mind you. That would have been easy. I’m talking about the seasoning packet that you would use to make a pint of ranch dressing.)

I’ve mellowed somewhat in my old age, and these days the heavy-handed “I dare you…” taunts that used to set me off no longer have any power to sway me.

But your subtle implication that my writing style “wouldn’t really lend itself to being able to write a whole 50,000 words in a single month” made me raise my hackles a little bit.

“Who does this little punk think he is?” I found myself thinking. “Implying I can’t swing NaNoWriMo? You think I can’t be mythic and lyric AND write 50,000 words? The fuck I can’t!” (Via.)

And pep talks like this one from Neil Gaiman:

The last novel I wrote (it was Anansi Boys, in case you were wondering) when I got three-quarters of the way through I called my agent. I told her how stupid I felt writing something no-one would ever want to read, how thin the characters were, how pointless the plot. I strongly suggested that I was ready to abandon this book and write something else instead, or perhaps I could abandon the book and take up a new life as a landscape gardener, bank-robber, short-order cook or marine biologist. And instead of sympathising or agreeing with me, or blasting me forward with a wave of enthusiasm—or even arguing with me—she simply said, suspiciously cheerfully, “Oh, you’re at that part of the book, are you?”

I was shocked. “You mean I’ve done this before?”

“You don’t remember?”

“Not really.”

“Oh yes,” she said. “You do this every time you write a novel. But so do all my other clients.”

I didn’t even get to feel unique in my despair.

So I put down the phone and drove down to the coffee house in which I was writing the book, filled my pen and carried on writing. (Via.)

Or this from John Scalzi, which isn’t technically NaNoWriMo related, but still:

It’s a relationship with words, essentially. I have one and it manifests itself through my fingers, usually onto a computer screen but occasionally with pen and paper. It’s a relationship in which I feel defined, in no small part because in the act of writing I have been able to define myself, to myself and to others. (Via.)

I put off participating in NaNoWriMo for a long time—partly ’cause it felt like a goofy gimmick, which in some ways I guess it is, and partly ’cause I didn’t want to become the sort of person who says things like “NaNoWriMo” in public, which has, regrettably, happened—but I’m really enjoying it so far, even as it slowly strangles my social life and my sanity and my sleep schedule into a blackened husk. Thanks to the daily word count requirement, I’ve cranked out over 20,000 words so far on a novel that I don’t hate, and the idea of pushing it to 50,000 (or beyond) by month’s end seems totally feasible, and the idea of spending the next year rewriting and editing seems pretty exciting. (Well, it does now, at least.) So yeah. It’s slowly killing me. But I’m kind of okay with that.

(Angry) Comics Art Mob! Boise! This Weekend!

THIS WEEKEND, I’ll be tagging along with Joëlle Jones and Jamie S. Rich in order to participate in the Boise Art Museum’s Comics Art Mob. While those two will be doing all sorts of fancy-pants stuff, including talking about “drawing, writing, publishing and pursuing a career in comics,” I’ll be calmly lighting torches and sharpening pitchforks doing this:

Comics, Controversy & Culture Evening Presentation
Erik Henriksen, comics writer and editor for the Portland Mercury, joins Monica Hopkins, Executive Director of ACLU of Idaho, for a conversation about the history of comics and freedom of speech in conjunction with the exhibition Comics at the Crossroads: Art of the Graphic Novel.
$10 (BAM or ACLU members and college students w/ ID)
$20 (non-members)

Looks like it’s your lucky day, Boise residents who have been patiently waiting for me to show up and endlessly ramble on about comics! More info about the whole deal is here.